CalCCW  

Go Back   CalCCW > Concealed Carry in California > Legal
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Legal Discuss legal issues of California CCW

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2008, 01:33 PM
GunSlut's Avatar
GunSlut GunSlut is offline
FM & Head Janitor
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: THE OC
Posts: 1,152
Default FEDERAL: Support H.R. 1399 and S. 1001 to force D.C. to comply with Supreme Court

Gun Rights Dean Anticipates National Support for Capitol Hill Effort to Torpedo Washington, D.C. Assault on United States Supreme Court Heller Decisio - Yahoo! News

Gun Rights Dean Anticipates National Support for Capitol Hill
Effort to Torpedo Washington, D.C. Assault on United States
Supreme Court Heller Decision

Tue Jul 22, 6:15 PM ET

To: LIFESTYLES EDITORS

Contact: John Snyder of Telum Associates, LL.C., +1-703-212-9863

WASHINGTON, July 22 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- "America's 80
million law-abiding gun owners will support a developing
congressional effort to thwart politicians in the Nation's
Capital seeking to undermine the Supreme Court decision in the
historic District of Columbia v. Heller case," right to
self-defense advocate John M. Snyder said here today.

"After the Court threw out the D.C. handgun ban as an
unconstitutional violation of the Second Amendment individual
right to keep and bear arms, D.C. officials thumbed their noses
at the Court," continued Snyder, Manager of Telum Associates,
LL.C., and Public Affairs Director of the Citizens Committee for
the Right to Keep and Bear Arms. "They acted recently to continue
the ban on semiautomatic handguns. They told **** Anthony Heller,
who won the case, he still cannot register his .45 caliber Colt
1911 handgun."

Snyder, named "dean of gun lobbyists" by The Washington Post and
The New York Times, noted that, "H.R. 1399, the proposed Second
Amendment Enforcement Act introduced by Reps. Mike Ross (AR) and
Mark Souder (IN), to repeal D.C. provisions at issue in the case,
already has 247 cosponsors -- well over half the membership of
the House of Representatives. H. Res. 1331, by Congressman
Souder, would force early consideration of a modified version of
the bill if activated by the signatures of 218 Representatives on
a discharge petition the Hoosier lawmaker plans to file.

"Since the D.C. government thinks it's superior to the Supreme
Court, Congress ought to tell gun-grabbing D.C. politicians to
take a hike. Souder's move would do the trick. Concerned citizens
around the country can support Souder by urging their own U.S.
Representatives to endorse H. Res. 1331."

The Senate companion measure, S. 1001, by Sen. Kay Bailey
Hutchison of Texas, already has 47 cosponsors, Snyder reported.

"D.C. politicians have treated the Supreme Court with contempt,"
said Snyder. "They have refused to recognize appropriately the
right to self-protection. They have refused to honor freedom of
choice of appropriate arms for self-defense by **** Anthony
Heller and others. Congress must not allow the District to get
away with it. It should move the proposed Second Amendment
Enforcement Act and it should move it soon."

Contact: John Snyder 703-212-9863

SOURCE Telum Associates, LL.C.
__________________
Most of us here "Know A Guy" Do you?

www.firearmstraining.com

You can call me Gun Slut, Mr. GunSlut, GS. Don't ever call me Slut!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2008, 01:40 PM
RomanDad's Avatar
RomanDad RomanDad is offline
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Orange County
Posts: 3,102
Default

Geez- DC is three senators away from getting its teeth knocked down its throat by congress? Isnt one beating a month enough for them?
__________________
"P.S. Somebody is going to have to PM me why I have an account here already... Where am I? How did I get here? Im a founding member no less?"

"Seriously... I have no idea where I am..... What happened?"

"SBIMB"
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2008, 01:42 PM
RomanDad's Avatar
RomanDad RomanDad is offline
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Orange County
Posts: 3,102
Default

Now.... If we can get national CCW reciprocity attached as an amendment....
__________________
"P.S. Somebody is going to have to PM me why I have an account here already... Where am I? How did I get here? Im a founding member no less?"

"Seriously... I have no idea where I am..... What happened?"

"SBIMB"
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2008, 02:21 PM
OCRancher's Avatar
OCRancher OCRancher is offline
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: The land of the "Duke".
Posts: 2,709
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RomanDad View Post
Now.... If we can get national CCW reciprocity attached as an amendment....
LOL, as funny as it may sound, that could WORK!!!!
__________________
"Saying a person has the right to defend themself, while not allowing them a CCW, is like espousing free speech as long as no verbs are involved." ~ Some really cool guy, circa 2007

"Mr. Heller maintains that disassembled rifles and shotguns are no substitute for handguns, "any more than the government could prohibit books because it permits newspapers and considers them an 'adequate substitute.'" "

"America is at that awkward stage. It’s too late to change the system from within, yet too early to shoot the bastards." - Claire Wolf

"SHIMH"
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2008, 02:25 PM
RomanDad's Avatar
RomanDad RomanDad is offline
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Orange County
Posts: 3,102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OCRancher View Post
LOL, as funny as it may sound, that could WORK!!!!
Im not laughing.

This thing has legs.... If we can push to get this thing passed in September, it would be an easy matter to get someone to attach a "National CCW Reciprocity" clause to the bill at the last minute.
__________________
"P.S. Somebody is going to have to PM me why I have an account here already... Where am I? How did I get here? Im a founding member no less?"

"Seriously... I have no idea where I am..... What happened?"

"SBIMB"
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2008, 02:57 PM
KimberDude's Avatar
KimberDude KimberDude is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Northern Bay Area
Posts: 266
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by RomanDad View Post
Im not laughing.

This thing has legs.... If we can push to get this thing passed in September, it would be an easy matter to get someone to attach a "National CCW Reciprocity" clause to the bill at the last minute.
Two questions:

1. What can we do to make this happen?

2. If national ccw reciprocity becomes real, then would someone who resides in California that has a non-resident Florida/Utah ccw permit be recognized in California?
__________________
"The more we sweat in practice, the less we bleed in battle." -Chinese Proverb
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2008, 03:04 PM
libertarian's Avatar
libertarian libertarian is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,132
Default

Does it strike anyone else as screwed up that it requires an act of congress to get a city to follow a mandate issued by the supreme court?
__________________
"The more good guys on the street that are armed, the fewer spare magazines I need to carry."

Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2008, 03:21 PM
Ken_In_Colo's Avatar
Ken_In_Colo Ken_In_Colo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: western Colorado
Posts: 261
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by libertarian View Post
Does it strike anyone else as screwed up that it requires an act of congress to get a city to follow a mandate issued by the supreme court?
Of course it's screwed up but it's what those people do...and they do it all the time. They have their own set of rules for themselves and another set of rules for the rest of us.
__________________
An armed populace are called citizens.
An unarmed populace are called subjects.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2008, 07:06 PM
OCRancher's Avatar
OCRancher OCRancher is offline
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: The land of the "Duke".
Posts: 2,709
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RomanDad View Post
Im not laughing.

This thing has legs.... If we can push to get this thing passed in September, it would be an easy matter to get someone to attach a "National CCW Reciprocity" clause to the bill at the last minute.

No kidding, this has the reality of national CCW written all over it. IIRC, a large part of Congress already supports this to get rid of all the interstate squabbles and rules that currently exist.
__________________
"Saying a person has the right to defend themself, while not allowing them a CCW, is like espousing free speech as long as no verbs are involved." ~ Some really cool guy, circa 2007

"Mr. Heller maintains that disassembled rifles and shotguns are no substitute for handguns, "any more than the government could prohibit books because it permits newspapers and considers them an 'adequate substitute.'" "

"America is at that awkward stage. It’s too late to change the system from within, yet too early to shoot the bastards." - Claire Wolf

"SHIMH"
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2008, 08:00 PM
EM2's Avatar
EM2 EM2 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Prather
Posts: 257
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RomanDad View Post
Now.... If we can get national CCW reciprocity attached as an amendment....

Why hold back, go for the gold, national "shall issue".

Without national shall issue in place a great many people will be left behind.
__________________
US Navy veteran
NRA Life member
CRPA member
American Legion
VFW

"Among other evils which being unarmed brings you, it causes you to be despised" Nicolo Machiavelli
"politicians occasionally stumble on the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened." Winston Churchill
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2008, 09:50 PM
X-ffdo's Avatar
X-ffdo X-ffdo is offline
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Bernardino Co.
Posts: 1,493
Default

"No person left behind" policy!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2008, 10:25 PM
NikNak's Avatar
NikNak NikNak is offline
Orange County Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: West Coast - OC USA
Posts: 450
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by libertarian View Post
Does it strike anyone else as screwed up that it requires an act of congress to get a city to follow a mandate issued by the supreme court?
Please go lightly on the politicians of DC ... they all went through the DC education system, have difficulty with word problems and cannot read very well. Then there is the issue of communication. They are way too far away from SCOTUS. The mail has yet to arrive.


I agree on the ammendment for national reciprocity .... why not just make it a National Shal Issue CCW based upon the results from the NICS system ...
__________________
Life is good!

Nik Nak

A man is not old until his dreams become regrets... - John Barrymore (1935)
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2008, 11:28 PM
CCWInstructor's Avatar
CCWInstructor CCWInstructor is offline
Founding Member & Social Director
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Huntington Beach
Posts: 8,008
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KimberDude View Post

2. If national ccw reciprocity becomes real, then would someone who resides in California that has a non-resident Florida/Utah ccw permit be recognized in California?
The answer is NO!

None residence has already reared its ugly head in Colorado, Florida and a few other states..
__________________
"A kind word only goes so far, a kind word and a gun goes a lot further" Al Capone 1924

Be Safe, Be Confident, Get Trained! ® Copyrighted 1996

Amateurs Talk Hardware (Guns)

Professionals Talk Software (Training)

greg@firearmstraining.com

Oh Yeah! Piss On Golf! Waste of a good range.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 07-24-2008, 12:00 PM
Ken_In_Colo's Avatar
Ken_In_Colo Ken_In_Colo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: western Colorado
Posts: 261
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CCWInstructor View Post
The answer is NO!

None residence has already reared its ugly head in Colorado, Florida and a few other states..
That was one of the first things that happened when the state went from RED to BLUE in 2006. Non-resident CCWs would probably be the first thing CA, NJ, WI, IL etc would implement.
__________________
An armed populace are called citizens.
An unarmed populace are called subjects.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8
©2007 CalCCW.com