Contact Arnold.

[coq]

Let him know how you feel about the control and restriction of guns and ammunition.

Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger - Interact

or,

Governor's Office:
Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger
State Capitol Building
Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: 916-445-2841
Fax: 916-558-3160 ( new number )
District Offices:
Fresno Office
2550 Mariposa Mall #3013
Fresno, CA 93721
Phone: 559-477-1804
Fax: 559-445-5328
Los Angeles Office
300 South Spring Street
Suite 16701
Los Angeles, CA 90013
Phone: 213-897-0322
Fax: 213-897-0319
Riverside Office
3737 Main Street #201
Riverside, CA 92501
Phone: 951-680-6860
Fax: 951-680-6863
San Diego Office
1350 Front Street
Suite 6054
San Diego, CA 92101
Phone: 619-525-4641
Fax: 619-525-4640
San Francisco Office
455 Golden Gate Avenue
Suite 14000
San Francisco, CA 94102
Phone: 415-703-2218
Fax: 415-703-2803
Washington D.C. Office
134 Hall of the States
444 North Capitol Street NW
Washington D.C. 20001
Phone: 202-624-5270
Fax: 202-624-5280
__________________

[Rob P.]

Done.

DO THIS!!!

Be polite, be succinct, and be proactive in requesting that the Gov veto these bills.

Get your family & friends involved as well.

[THE Gimper]

Done.

[coq]

On that "Interact" link, I found it odd that under the subject of Gun Control, you're asked to state "Pro" or "Con"...and that it makes no sense that we should mark "Con," making a double negative for retaining our rights. Anyone else confused with the selection there?

[THE Gimper]

Originally Posted by coq

On that "Interact" link, I found it odd that under the subject of Gun Control, you're asked to state "Pro" or "Con"...and that it makes no sense that we should mark "Con," making a double negative for retaining our rights. Anyone else confused with the selection there?

It's not a double negative. It's not asking if you're pro gun or anti gun. It's asking what your position is on the issue of gun control. Are you for gun control (Pro) or against gun control (Con)?

[coq]

Originally Posted by THE Gimper

It's not a double negative. It's not asking if you're pro gun or anti gun. It's asking what your position is on the issue of gun control. Are you for gun control (Pro) or against gun control (Con)?

I understand that. My instinct was to select Pro, then I went back and changed afterward. I wanted to bring to attention any potential for confusion.

[Dutchman]

I've sent respectful e-mails on a few topics in the past. Here is the response I get...funny, as every response was the same.

"Thank you for writing me about Assembly Bill 962. I appreciate your suggestions on proposed legislation affecting our state.

I generally do not take a position on legislation until a bill has reached my desk because it can change significantly from the time it is introduced until the time it is finalized. For the current session, the California Legislature has until September 11, 2009 to pass legislation, and I have until October 11, 2009 to sign or veto proposed bills.

You may continue to follow this and any other bill under consideration by lawmakers at the Official California Legislative website: Official California Legislative Information. You may also read my legislative messages at Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger - Breaking News, Webcasts, Blogs, YouTube, Flickr, Twitter @Schwarzenegger.

Again, I appreciate your interest in California's future. An informed and engaged public is important for effective government in our state."

Fill in the blank for the bill number.

[Yoda]

DONE

Had to stop and think about it before I hit the send button.

The Pro/Con thing leaves a bad taste, like having to press one for English.

[zinfull]

I have sent the emails about this bill from the beginning. The governor will not veto this bill and it will have to do will the money the state can get by stopping the internet sales. More sale tax money to cover their lousy performance.

Pro or con == for or against
either way it should be con on both gun control and the bill AB692, it would be more confusing if it was a pro 2A bill.

Please keep the pressure up and prove me wrong.

jerry

[safe carry]

E-Mail sent

[PHM]

Originally Posted by zinfull

The governor will not veto this bill and it will have to do will the money the state can get by stopping the internet sales. More sale tax money to cover their lousy performance.

This doesn't really make sense, since if this bill passes, you will be restircted to only 50 rounds per month, thus competely eliminating any revenue anyway.

[RickD6023]

Originally Posted by PHM

This doesn't really make sense, since if this bill passes, you will be restircted to only 50 rounds per month, thus competely eliminating any revenue anyway.

The 50-round transfer portion of bill was eliminated by the state senate along with a couple other issues. The thumb print, sequestering of ammo, licensing portions were retained. It is still one LOUSY bill.

[BonoVox]

Originally Posted by RickD6023

The 50-round transfer portion of bill was eliminated by the state senate along with a couple other issues. The thumb print, sequestering of ammo, licensing portions were retained. It is still one LOUSY bill.

All meaning you will NEVER see it sold at Wallmart again.

How about the mail order part of it?

[~Scott~]

E-mail sent....

[KimberDude]

Done!