CalCCW  

Go Back   CalCCW > Concealed Carry in California > General CCW Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 08-02-2008, 08:59 PM
CCWInstructor's Avatar
CCWInstructor CCWInstructor is offline
Founding Member & Social Director
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Huntington Beach
Posts: 7,822
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hbliam View Post
This is what I was told while I was there. We lost 2 or 3 guys (only one was a "loss").
I know a agency that has the same problem. After looking it up in the Post Administrative Manual (PAM), I found a way to make it work for them. They went into POST-EDI (Electronic Data Interchange) Input his six digit ID and made it happen.

Sounds like somebody didn't do their homework.
__________________
"A kind word only goes so far, a kind word and a gun goes a lot further" Al Capone 1924

Be Safe, Be Confident, Get Trained! ® Copyrighted 1996

Amateurs Talk Hardware (Guns)

Professionals Talk Software (Training)

greg@firearmstraining.com

Oh Yeah! Piss On Golf! Waste of a good range.
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 08-02-2008, 11:02 PM
libertarian's Avatar
libertarian libertarian is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,093
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RomanDad View Post
Civil liability requires ACTUAL DAMAGES, i.e. MEDICAL BILLS.... Which you wouldn't expect from a mere threat of use.
Well, since "Intentional infliction of emotional distress" is a recognized tort, I sure wouldn't be posting the details anywhere if it was me.

But sounds like CCWI answered the question definitively for us anyway.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old 08-03-2008, 07:44 AM
RomanDad's Avatar
RomanDad RomanDad is offline
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Orange County
Posts: 3,007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by libertarian View Post
Well, since "Intentional infliction of emotional distress" is a recognized tort, I sure wouldn't be posting the details anywhere if it was me.

But sounds like CCWI answered the question definitively for us anyway.
IIED is MUCH harder to sue under than most people think.... The conduct has to be EXTREME AND OUTRAGEOUS (The classics are watching your CHILDREN get KILLED, Looking in your moms casket and not recognizing the man inside, then finding out she was mistakingly cremated, etc). PLUS... There have to be PHYSICAL manifestations of the distress...

Finding an attorney to sue for "Brandishing" will be difficult because theres just no money there. Add to the fact that it might be JUSTIFIED to SOME DEGREE- Not impossible but theres a reason we dont have any examples. Its a longshot...
__________________
"P.S. Somebody is going to have to PM me why I have an account here already... Where am I? How did I get here? Im a founding member no less?"

"Seriously... I have no idea where I am..... What happened?"

"SBIMB"

Last edited by RomanDad : 08-03-2008 at 07:47 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8
©2007 CalCCW.com