![]() |
|
|||
|
Hey all,
Found this in LA times murder blog. Los Angeles Times: The Homicide Blog An arrest was made in about 41% of all murders committed in Los Angeles County in 2007, according to data collected by the Homicide Report. Wow, just wow. Not even 50% of murders were solved. So not only can the police not protect you in LA. (or anywhere) they can't even find you killer more than 1/2 the time??? How does this compare to anywhere else in California? |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Remember, solving murders and arresting people for murders are two separate things. How many murders were committed that they KNOW who the perpetrator is, but can't find him, or they know he's skipped town, or the evidence just doesn't support an arrest. I suspect you might be able to add another 10-15% on to that number.
__________________
![]() Quote:
|
|
|||
|
No, the other way. More like 50-60% are solved - as in, we know who did it - but in some of those we can't arrest the guy 'cause we can't find him or we don't have enough evidence.
OTOH, not all of those arrested are going to end with convictions. And a few of those convictions are just wrong - Reason Magazine - Hit & Run > Eddie Lee Howard: Mississippi's Next Exoneration? |
|
|||
|
Then does solved equal a conviction or just that you know who did it?
Because was thinking of case solved as being that the killer is caught and sent to jail or is killed (either in the action of arresting him, or by another would be victim. Last edited by AF_int1n0 : 02-18-2008 at 11:01 AM. Reason: To make sense. |
|
||||
|
Read beyond the fuzzy math and you find:
Quote:
__________________
Be nice.........until it's time to not be nice. |
|
||||
|
I got to say, I would only consider the case closed if the suspect were caught & convicted, killed, or exonerated, (as in self defense). Anything else is just BS. If a case is closed due to "some impediment to prosecuting a known suspect" then that means he is still on the loose to commit a crime again. I certainly would not put that in the case closed column and mislead the public in the crime stats. I believe most people would have a false sense of accomplishment for the LEOs.
__________________
US Navy veteran NRA Life member CRPA member American Legion VFW "Among other evils which being unarmed brings you, it causes you to be despised" Nicolo Machiavelli "politicians occasionally stumble on the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened." Winston Churchill |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
LOL...the other way!
__________________
![]() Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
I think a good case in point would be Joran Van Der Sloot...I don't think there is anyone who doesn't think he's guilty as sin, yet he hasn't been arrested and stood trial for his crime (yet). Some would consider it solved, it's just a matter of tying up loose ends and evidence. Others would not see it as solved. But I don't think anyone questions if he did it or not.
__________________
![]() Quote:
Last edited by IAmASensFan : 02-18-2008 at 12:37 PM. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() Did he or didn't he...He says he didn't actually kill her, but when he isn't certain if she is dead or not, and supposedly has a friend come out and dump the body in the ocean, I'd say that goes beyond not reporting her death, and crosses into the realm of being responsible. It isn't hard to prove someone died by alcohol poisoning...the fact that he's so evasive, and there is no body, makes a pretty good argument for suspicious death and not accidental death... Without a body, we'll never know, and he'll likely never be prosecuted...
__________________
![]() Quote:
Last edited by IAmASensFan : 02-18-2008 at 01:16 PM. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|