Revoked CCW and your CII number.

[BonoVox]

It will 100% effect me!

[Ken_In_Colo]

Originally Posted by OCCCW

I often need security clearance to gain access to sensitive manufacturing areas for defense projects, there are no interviews, nor is there a process to explain why I would have a black mark. Can you shed some light in that area?

in 1996, my now daughter-in-law was a CT (Cryptologic Technician) which required the highest clearance a Naval enlisted person can get. When she was based in DC, numerous CTs lost their clearances and hence their rate, for what we might consider minor reasons:

• DUIs
• Losing DL because of speeding
• Financial problems
• Gambling
• Dating or having friendships with foreign nationals

No reviews, no explanations, no slack. One day they were CTs in real nice jobs in DC; the next day they were SM (Signalmen) on harbor tugs in Adak.

Early in my career, I was a systems engineer for a large computer company. One of the customers I supported was a Lockheed plant that made weapons systems radars. It took a month before I was allowed inside the computer room. They did background checks on me and gave me a Secret clearance. That allowed me to be in the computer area only but I could not be in the computer room whenever they were running any test simulations. I had to be escorted to any of the other areas of the plant by a person w/a Top Secret clearance.

When one of their programmers lost his DL for DUI, they took away his clearance and transferred him out of the plant to a less sensitive position.

[sealbeach]

Originally Posted by AMS MIKE

This is our freakin SHEriff and she has no freakin clue what is legal/illegal or right/wrong.

I wonder if she has EVER made an accurate statement...None yet detected...

[PirateQueen]

Originally Posted by OCCCW

I would suppose then you will be available as an expert witness?

I don't profess to be an expert for one. Second when you are the head person/leader for any company or department there is an implied level of competency for holding that position. I just don't see it with her.

[OCCCW]

Originally Posted by PirateQueen

I don't profess to be an expert for one. Second when you are the head person/leader for any company or department there is an implied level of competency for holding that position. I just don't see it with her.

Soyy PirateQueen, I had meant to respond to "Gladiator's" initial comments and hit post too quickley.

[OCCCW]

Originally Posted by Ken_In_Colo

in 1996, my now daughter-in-law was a CT (Cryptologic Technician) which required the highest clearance a Naval enlisted person can get. When she was based in DC, numerous CTs lost their clearances and hence their rate, for what we might consider minor reasons:

• DUIs
• Losing DL because of speeding
• Financial problems
• Gambling
• Dating or having friendships with foreign nationals

No reviews, no explanations, no slack. One day they were CTs in real nice jobs in DC; the next day they were SM (Signalmen) on harbor tugs in Adak.

Early in my career, I was a systems engineer for a large computer company. One of the customers I supported was a Lockheed plant that made weapons systems radars. It took a month before I was allowed inside the computer room. They did background checks on me and gave me a Secret clearance. That allowed me to be in the computer area only but I could not be in the computer room whenever they were running any test simulations. I had to be escorted to any of the other areas of the plant by a person w/a Top Secret clearance.

When one of their programmers lost his DL for DUI, they took away his clearance and transferred him out of the plant to a less sensitive position.

"No reviews, no explanations, no slack." + single minded bitch in control = one (several) big fricken lawsuit(s) leaving the BOS holding the bag for a real bad decision when she is voted out.

[Ken_In_Colo]

Originally Posted by OCCCW

"No reviews, no explanations, no slack." + single minded bitch in control = one (several) big fricken lawsuit(s) leaving the BOS holding the bag for a real bad decision when she is voted out.

She might be writing checks her ego can't cash.

Look for signs that the BOS is drifting away from her. Sup Bates has already back-peddled when she said she "had no hint" of what Sheriff was gonna do [regarding CCWs]; and I believe Sup Bates.