![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Announcements for Orange County CCW Announcements for Orange County |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Moorlach staff demands good PR! * posted by Steven Greenhut
<http://orangepunch.freedomblogging.com/author/sgreenhut/> I took a recent (April 14) PR tour of the Theo Lacy jail with Sheriff's Department officials and two members of Supervisor John Moorlach's staff. This is interesting because Sheriff Hutchens - in her rebuttal to a Register editorial about her denial of a deputies code of silence - wrote that "Repeated invitations to your staff to come over and see, point by point, all of the changes we have implemented have been ignored. That invitation remains open and unanswered." That letter was written a couple of weeks after my tour, and the sheriff personally approved my attendance on the tour according to Supervisor Moorlach's Chief of Staff Mario Mainero, so I'm not quite sure why she claims that no one from the Register has come and taken a look at departmental changes. I would guess that other Register writers have been there also. Then again, Sheriff Hutchens has shown a disturbing tendency to be a spin- meister rather than a truth-teller. <It turns out that Sandra Hutchens is another lying Sheriff | Orange Juice! Politics For The Rest Of Us. -another-lying-sheriff/> The problem, I suppose, is that I have not yet written the expected favorable article about the visit. Although the Hutchens PR folks have been pros, the Moorlach folks have twice questioned my motives - not for anything I've written, but for not having done the PR gig for Hutchens. I've never taken a PR tour and confronted such blatant demands for positive publicity. I am indeed planning to write about jail reform again, and will do so once I sort through both sides. My initial leaning is that some real improvements have taken place, and those deserve to be commended. Other sources, however, claim that only superficial improvements have taken place - and I'm trying to sort through the issue. Most confusing, though, is the sheriff repeatedly denies that there are cultural problems in the department and has recently lashed out against the DA's office for pointing to a deputy code of silence in the case of a deputy who was being prosecuted for abusing a Taser <http://blog.ocsd.org/post/2009/04/24...ponds-to-Code- of-Silence-Claims.aspx> . If there's no problem, then how could serious reform have taken place? In the sheriff's view, the only problem that ever existed in the department was that a handful of deputies misbehaved in a handful of cases. Yet a number of serious and wide-ranging cases, ranging from the Chamberlain murder to the Stenger incident (alleged cover up of a fellow deputy accused of molestation), all have the code of silence as a common thread. If Hutchens is right, then Carona ran a good department, and she merely had to root out a couple of bad apples once he and Jack Anderson left. When I toured the jail (albeit on a planned visit in which deputies throughout the jail were warned of my group's tour), I was told about reduced wait times for inmates' visitors. A group of inmates we spoke to said that deputies have been far nicer than they had been under Mike Carona's leadership. There are still shot callers, they said, but they don't run the jail like they did before. There's no TV in the guard station any more (will wonders never cease?). The inmates did confirm that deputies had been abusive in the past. This information definitely is encouraging, but not conclusive. Yet one reader sent me this email from Moorlach Deputy Chief of Staff Rick Francis, a probation official who spent some of his tour time schmoozing with his past associates at the jail: "I did ask Mr. Greenhut after our visit if he planned to write anything positive about what he saw. His silence speaks volumes..." What speaks volumes is the way the Moorlach office defensively supports everything the sheriff does (including its heavyhanded security tactics and efforts to undermine the Second Amendment in the county) and attributes ill motives to those who don't jump on the bandwagon. One would think that the Moorlach staff would be supportive of some things and critical of other things in the department. Instead they've gone into full-defense mode for the sheriff's department for transparently political reasons - to justify the supervisor's instrumental role in Hutchens' appointment. Power and politics do funny things to people, however, even to the incorruptible John Moorlach!
__________________
The Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper, elected by the founding members, serves as the protocol and chief law enforcement officer and is the principal administrative manager for most support services of CALCCW.com. As chief law enforcement officer of the this forum, the Sergeant at Arms is charged with maintaining security and protection of the members themselves. The Sergeant at Arms serves as the executive officer of this forum for enforcement of all rules of the Committee on Rules and Administration regulating this forum and has responsibility for and immediate supervision of the forum floor, chamber and galleries. The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating forum rules. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|