Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Carry
Those are wonderful anecdotes. But they are just that. No study has shown that reserves suffer any higher victimization than the general population.
|
Common sense doesn't need a study.
Quote:
Originally Posted by THE Gimper
And regardless, all applicants are supposed to be treated equally. It is not fair, equitable or legal to treat any group of applicants differently.
|
I'm totally down with your cause. I feel for the problems you guys are having. I'm pro CCW for almost anyone. But when you start going after the judges/reserve PO's you are starting to lose me and I'm sure you'll lose others. Most reasonable people can draw the conclusion that those two classes are in need of a CCW without question. When you start comparing yourselves to them you start to get a little of the "gun nut" clouding up your cause.
Some of you that applied for CCW's have had your lives threatened. EVERY judge and PO has, numerous times.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gravedigger
I feel for you, but being classified as an gar-un-dam-teed by the U.S. Gu'Mint UNARMED CITIZEN puts an instant target on MY head, so I see no difference in the threat level.
|
I do see a differance and support the issuance of CCW's to judges and RPO's without delay.