The medication thing is nasty - anyone who brings suit based on pharmaceutical discrimination invites risk of protected medical records joining public record of the case.
OTOH, a good attorney with an appropriate medical-legal consultant could do wonders at reducing exposure.
The press-eating public just love a good medical-legal scandal when it's framed right, though whoever agreed to such a health-history would be taking a pretty big hit for the team.
I'm just sayin...
__________________
"Always Shoot Back First" - El Gato, post #76757
Don't shoot the Lion - he's one of us!
"The Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation."
Supreme Court of the United States: District of Columbia et al. v. Heller (page 19)
|