Quote:
Originally Posted by Bombard
I was on a Federal jury last December. One of the defense attorneys became a joke in the jury for his convoluted objections.
"Objection, Rule (some number I can't remember) lack of foundation, compound, leading, and vague.
After every FRIGGING question.
If he hadn't had a brilliant close he would have lost it all. As it was he got a split decision.
|
Was he WINNING the objections? i.e. was the judge ruling in his favor and making the prosecutor reformulate his questions?
MOST defense attorneys are REALLY, REALLY good attorneys.
A lot of prosecutors, ARENT so good.... Without knowing anything else, the fact that the defense was making lots of objections indicates to me the Prosecutor was a boob....