What's this - check on credentials thing ???
If you want my bio info see
AIMED Point Shooting or P&S
Here's a snipet from the intro part that may address the issue of credentials:
"Well, police and others question things, and some like credentials.
However, when you are dealing with innovation and advancement, credentials attesting to past learned behaviors may not be of that much value.
That is because traditional/institutionalized practices and behaviors can be almost insurmountable obstacles to advancement, and particularly in the world of the gun which deals with life and death matters, and is steeped in military history, dogma, and tradition.
Additionally, "experts" who have taught, and continue to teach the "wrong" shooting methods as proven by scientific investigation and studies, can be expected to slam any upstart who questions their behavior. And their associates can be expected out of fellowship, to do the same."
..........
Note the article supports all types of PS.
I think my brand is better because it is natural, does not require cognitive driven skills, negates grip issues, etc.....
In gunfight videos we do see Officers point their gun and shooting. That's all i think is needed plus a bit of help from mom nature as to our ability to point accurately which is what the US Army says we can do.
Again I think SS is questionable because it relies on our ability to see and use the sights in a CQB situation.
So any type of PS should be better. And once you go there, I think "you" will naturally gravitate over time to the simplest and most natural method for accurate (not precision), aiming at CQ.